Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:18

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Nintendo will finally reveal more about Donkey Kong Bananza in new Direct - Polygon
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Dotemu’s CEO on how it makes new games that feel retro - The Verge
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Tesla just lost the head of its robotics division - The Verge
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Devil’s Third director says panned Wii U game was innovative for its time - Nintendo Everything
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
NBA Draft will have tons of international talent, which is to be expected - NBA
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
This Cat Poop Parasite Can Decapitate Sperm—and It Might Be Fueling Infertility - Gizmodo
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Prayers Pouring In After Fatal Car Accident Involving Ohio State Football Legend - Yahoo Sports